In previous posts I have discussed the pros and cons of traditional publishing versus self-publishing. Here is an update to help clarify any misconceptions about the topic.
One route is DIY for tech savvy people. The other is for royalty, where the butler waits on you hand and foot. I would rather have the butler, but we all cannot be born with a silver spoon in our mouths. DIY also costs money and time. With traditional, if you are picked up, you could see an advance. The down side to traditional is you could spend years in the rejection zone.
A pro for DIY is you keep the creative rights of your book. With all the different companies to help you publish your dream book it seems easier now to see your book in print. Another pro for DIY authors is that some publishers (Penguin) picks up indie authors to publish.
The list goes on and on with both sides.
If you cannot decide which route is best for you then check out some tips below. This article was first published on Forbes.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/juliapimsleur/2014/11/04/traditional-publishing-vs-self-publishing/
Another great article, about an author who is a “hybrid” author ( self-published and traditional), on the topic of the pros and cons of DIY versus legacy (traditional) publishing.
http://blog.nathanbransford.com/2014/04/self-publishing-vs-traditional-some.html
Some authors like both routes and choose to use them on separate book projects. It’s whatever works best for you. Don’t limit your decision on one factor. Take everything into account and ask advice of others.
So which route will you choose?
writersobsession
Writing Tips for Beginners 
Leave a Reply